[speex-dev] Optimizing speex for 44.1kHz

[John Hayes]

You raise an excellent point that I missed, it's certainly faster to do the
sample -rate conversion than encode and decode the additional data.

I will purse that, thanks.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Marc Valin [mailto:jean-marc.valin at hermes.usherb.ca]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:50 AM
> To: speex
> Cc: John Hayes
> Subject: Re: [speex-dev] Optimizing speex for 44.1kHz

> The cost of down-sampling, if done efficiently, is probably less then
> the cost difference between 32 kHz and 44.1 kHz so it's probably worth
> it. If you don't care about standard sampling rate, you could even to a
> 2/3 conversion which would get you 29.4 kHz...

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.