[vorbis] TAG Standard - ENSEMBLE/PERFORMER tags

[Jonathan Walther]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:12:00AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> Frankly I'm relieved we didn't need to standardize on RFC2047 *or* a
>> UTF8_LANG tag.  Glad we were able to come to consensus on something.
>
>Well, Dan still has problems with the conversions and thinks we should
>still use RFC2047.  I agree there is a problem with conversions (but it's
>not nearly so major: the bulk of CJK characters, Han symbols, don't have
>this problem.)  I don't know how major it is, but I've suggested a possible
>fix that I believe is cleaner than using RFC2047.

Wait... so that URL you provided that lets you specify a language
encoding inline isn't always sufficient?  Whew.  What does it take?

Jonathan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 797 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20020111/40c69708/part.pgp