[Speex-dev] Re: XIPH Internet-Drafts

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Jun 7 09:59:11 PDT 2007

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:29:16PM +0200, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:58:17PM -0700, Ralph Giles wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:20:05PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>Hi Luca,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thank you for working on the Theora and Vorbis drafts in the IETF's AVT
> >>>>>WG. Do you also plan to work on the Speex draft?
> >>>>other people are working on the speex I-D, Ralph should be able to tell
> >>>>you which to contact ^^;
> >>>Hi Ralph, let me know how I can help on the Speex I-D -- we'd like to 
> >>>make sure that our usage in Jingle is consistent with the SDP. Thanks!
> >>I've not been following the speex draft updates, but Alfred Heggestad 
> >>and Jean-Marc have been discussing it recently. Speex-dev@ is the proper 
> >>forum, now CC'd. :)
> >
> >Great, thanks! Is there still time to send in comments before you submit
> >the -01 draft? I've joined speex-dev so that I can provide comments here
> >(though presumably the AVT WG list is the right location going forward).
> >
> Your comments are welcome.

I'm not a Speex expert or an RTP expert, but the SDP looks good and
overall it reads well.

BTW in my experience it is a PITA to have multiple document authors
when it comes to AUTH48 (everyone needs to sign off on the doc with the
RFC Editor and that can introduce delays). For the XMPP specs we just
made me the sole editor and had nice credits for everyone else. YMMV.


Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation

More information about the Speex-dev mailing list