[Speex-dev] Who is using the jitter buffer?

[Shantanu Gramsci]

It seems that speex jitter buffer is tightly coupled
with SPEEX codec [we have to give a speex decoder
instance to JB]. It would be better if we could use it
with any codec, like speex preprocessor and AEC.

What are the any paper/theory/algorithms behind
current ADAPTIVENESS of speex JB? Links to those
algo/papers would help to understand better.

-- Shantanu


--- Thorvald Natvig <speex at natvig.com> wrote:

> 
> Oh, I forgot to mention one thing. I currently
> append a few bits of custom 
> information to each speex packet which I fetch out
> with 
> things like
> speex_bits_unpack_unsigned(&sjJitter.current_packet,
> 1);
> 
> It would be very usefull if the jitter buffer didn't
> actually decode the 
> packet, but instead returned a pointer to it (or
> NULL if you should play 
> silence and -1 if you should repeat the last packet
> again).
> 
> If you're making a more generic API, it would also
> be beneficial if packet 
> loss (and late transmissions) statistics could be
> fetched somehow.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com