[speex-dev] Question about SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE

Jean-Marc Valin Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca
Fri May 28 13:42:15 PDT 2004


I'd say check the result just after denoising (try without denoising
too). Also make sure you've got the right number of samples and all. I
can't say much with the info you're giving me.

        Jean-Marc

Le ven 28/05/2004 à 16:29, Alex Wang a écrit :
> I just download the 1.1.5. And it is working well. I try the xxx_int
> functions at least it works. But I did not find the performance
> improvement.
> 
> But when I try this:
> 
>          m_pPreprocess=
> speex_preprocess_state_init(m_nSamplesPerFrame, m_nSampleRate);
> 
>          speex_preprocess_ctl(m_pPreprocess,
> SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_DENOISE, &tmp);
> 
> and add 
> 
>          speex_preprocess(m_pPreprocess, buf, NULL);
> 
> before encode. The result is really unacceptable. I think there must
> be something wrong.
> 
> And for the encode I did not use abr or vbr because I can not make
> them work.
> 
> Does the DENOISE really working in this ver? Or maybe I wrote some
> wrong code?
> 
> Tks.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Live Global Bid
> 
>                  
> ___________________________________
> 
> Alex X. Wang
> Programmer Analyst
> Live Global Bid Inc.
> alex at liveglobalbid.com
> Phone: (306) 584 1383 
> 
> 
>  

-- 
Jean-Marc Valin
http://www.xiph.org/~jm/
LABORIUS
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée.
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040528/ea584d8a/signature.pgp


More information about the Speex-dev mailing list