[speex-dev] speex on a DSP chip?
George Bratis
gbratis at patras.atmel.com
Tue Mar 30 23:51:20 PST 2004
I think that if you want to use a low cost dsp you must rewrite ti in
assebmly.
In our tests you will need 4-5 times more MIPS just compiling C code.
George
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Underwood" <steveu at coppice.org>
To: <speex-dev at xiph.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: [speex-dev] speex on a DSP chip?
<p>> George Bratis wrote:
>
> >Speex now runs on a fixed point DSP with relative little MIPS.
> >The main problem is that you must rewrite the hole code in assembly.
> >
> >George
> >
> >
> Why must you write it in assembly? What is wrong with running the C code
> on a DSP? Sure you can improve the efficiency if you use assembly, but
> why do you say it is *necessary*?
>
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> --- >8 ----
> List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
> Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'speex-dev-request at xiph.org'
> containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
> Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Speex-dev
mailing list