[Vorbis] What the difference between oggenc &

[Ulrich Windl]

On 16 Nov 2006 at 4:50, xiphmont at xiph.org wrote:

[...]
> In part they were; Garf was going for a differnet performance envelope
> than we wanted in the default encoder.  IIRC (Garf may contradict me
> here), what we didn't fold back in was that his encoder allocated many
> more bits to sections of heavy impulses and transients.  My opinion
> was that the encoder was overtuned for impulses at the expense of
> overall bitrate performance, but if preecho is the artifact you hate
> most, you would probably disagree with me and the GT encoders would be
> interesting to you.

I wonder whether such a "performance envelope" could become a command line option 
some day?

It seems hardly worth to have separate binaries.


Regards,
Ulrich