[vorbis] Bit Rate Peeling Quality

[Graham Mitchell]

> I don't have much to add to what you wrote, except that
> I don't think of my prototype peelers as being
> "unsophisticated".  Heck, one of-em even used Bessel
> functions! ;-)

Actually, I was thinking of the "April Fool's" peeler, which *was* a little 
braindead in certain places.  But then, of course, that was the point.

> With current streams, peeling from -q6 to -q2 will sound
> very bad, with a terrible lowpass and lots of flanging.

Okay, I'll file that away for next time I answer this question for someone.

> Other than that, what you wrote is fine, I think.

That's good to hear.  As with many high school teachers, I'm pretty good at 
making up plausible answers to questions even when I don't know what I'm 
talking about.  Looks like this time I did a little better than average!


-- 
Graham Mitchell - computer science teacher, Leander High School
Man:	 What man?
Praline: The man from the cat detector van.
Man:	 Loony detector van you mean.
Praline: It's people like you what cause unrest.

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.