[vorbis] TAG Standard - ENSEMBLE/PERFORMER tags
David K. Gasaway
dave at gasaway.org
Sat Jan 5 01:43:18 PST 2002
On 4 Jan 2002 at 0:03, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> Conductors are performers too. Yet noone seems to object (strongly) to
> having a separate CONDUCTOR tag.
I agree to a CONDUCTOR tag because a person may be both an instrumentalist and a
conductor. (see my earlier post) What would be a relevant example for soloist v. ensemble?
> If you want to tell winamp "display the
> ensemble, but not performers", without an ENSEMBLE tag, you can't do that.
>
> It may be self evident to a human that the LSO is an ensemble, but making
> the player software do special parsing on a PERFORMER tag to determine "oh
> yeah, there is an ensemble in here, I should display it" is out. That
> means an extra tag.
The *overriding goal* is to make the data human-readable. If the conductor were lumped into the
PERFORMER tag, without intimate knowledge of the recording or person in question, I'd have a
hard time extracting that person's role. Determining whether a performer is sigular or plural is
much more intuitive.
<p>
--
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- XNS : =David K Gasaway
-:-:- Email: dave at gasaway.org
-:-:- Web : dave.gasaway.org
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis
mailing list