[vorbis] TAG Standard - ENSEMBLE/PERFORMER tags

[Glenn Maynard]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:22:47AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> But you wanted more tags than what are currently in the standard, right?
> No problem; make a list, post it here for comment, and I'll put it in
> Appendix A.

No, I don't.  (Not currently.)  Sorry if I wasn't clear.

> At the rate things are going its going to be a looooooong wait.  Noone
> has felt sufficient need for the metadata stream to start using it, or
> even to start the discussion on this list of how they think it should be
> used...

Well, if it's not done now, it'll be much harder to do later.  Has there
been any brainstorming on the list at all?

> >If you *do* want to be able to do that, then the language of the tags is
> >needed.  A cheap way to do it would be to have a single "lang" tag, with
> >a standard two-letter language code.  (This would explicitely mark the
> 
> I disagree.  Tag data is 8 bit clean.  Right now it is mostly ascii but
> there is no reason why character encoding couldn't be specified as it is
> in RFC compliant email headers.  Its some kind of ugly 8 character ascii
> string, and I don't know what RFC it's specified, but when I see emails
> in my inbox and the subject shows up in Korean or Japanese glyphs, thats
> sure enough one of those mails.