[vorbis] TwinVQ versus The World

[aardvaak]

At 22:58 21/06/01 +0200, you wrote:
>"Marshall Eubanks" <tme at 21rst-century.com> wrote:
>
> > In my discussions with MPEG 4 developers, it looks like they may go
> > with MP3 (aka Layer 3) for audio due to its established position.
> >
> > This would leave AAC basically in the dust.
>
>Actually, AAC isn't intended to be used by ordinary users the
>way we use MP3 or Vorbis.
>AAC will be (mostly) used for music distribution since it
>comes with very expensive and restrictive licenses, and
>with encryption/copy-protection schemes.
>
>Liquid Audio is a good example.

Liquid Audio uses AAC ?

Technically speaking, is AAC bette at compressing (while retaining correct 
quality) than mp3pro, vorbis, WMA... ?

 
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.