[vorbis] TwinVQ versus The World

[aardvaak]

At 16:30 21/06/01 -0400, you wrote:
>Karol Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > The last few threads have really been interesting.  Technologies
> > that are currently on the market are MP3, RealAudio, and Windows
> > Media (pre-version8).  Technologies currently in progress or
> > just shipped are Ogg Vorbis and mp3pro.  I don't think anyone
> > has mentioned TwinVQ on this list.  While exploring alternatives
> > to MP3 (which is when I also found Vorbis), I noticed TwinVQ.  I
> > encoded a few tracks with TwinVQ and they sounded like shit, but
> > does anyone still consider TwinVQ a serious competitor in the
> > compressed audio market?  Does it have _any_ advantages over
> > anything else?  How about AAC?
> >
>
>In my discussions with MPEG 4 developers, it looks like they may go
>with MP3 (aka Layer 3) for audio due to its established position.

It's already the case with DiVX (sorry, DiVX ;) )

>This would leave AAC basically in the dust.

Don't forget AAC+SBR. Go to drm.com or search for "radio mondiale"on google.

 
______________________________________________________________________________
ifrance.com, l'email gratuit le plus complet de l'Internet !
vos emails depuis un navigateur, en POP3, sur Minitel, sur le WAP...
http://www.ifrance.com/_reloc/email.emailif

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.