[UCI-Devel] Re: [vorbis-dev] Re: UCI Project Announcement

[Smoerk]

alex at foogod.com wrote:

> It should also be noted that if UCI does prove to be serious and 
> capable (which
> I'm pretty confident it will), and produces a product which gets 
> adopted by a
> fair number of other systems, it may then be too late to make sure that it
> works with Ogg the way it should, and Ogg could easily get left out of the
> loop.  I would rather not see that happen, which is why I would like 
> to have
> input at this stage, when it's still feasable to change things, from 
> you guys
> about what you think UCI needs to meet your requirements.

I think it's not that important, that UCI works with Ogg, but that 
Vorbis (and Theora) could be a UCI codec. I'm not sure if Ogg should be 
an transport layer for lots of different codecs (patented ones?), but 
you could always use Vorbis audio as UCI codec, if you specification 
allows this.

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.