[Speex-dev] ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex

[Aymeric Moizard]

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:

> Hi Aymeric,
>
> Yes, I'm receiving the emails but haven't had enough time to look into
> the details yet. I've seen you responded to many comments, so what are
> the ones for which we still need to respond?

Summary is there:
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2837/

As I understand:
  we need to change "mode" definition to be ONLY a list of comma separated
  values. This is because order of several modes has no importance
  according to another rfc about SDP...

We need a few adjustment:
* cng and vbr should be optionnal to folow.
* ptime rouding text is not well understood
* it should be specified that the code is only defined for mono.
* ..

Also, we need to know why there is a "license" chapter (chapter 9)
and we need to remove it because ietf don't like it...

Probably a little more...

Aymeric

> 	Jean-Marc
>
> Aymeric Moizard a écrit :
>> Hi Jean-Marc, Alfred and Greg,
>>
>> Are you receiving the mails from IETF about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex
>>
>> The mails are not coming from AVT mailing list, but I think we are
>> all 3 part of a minimal list (draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex at tools.ietf.org)
>> dedicated to latest discussion about the draft.
>>
>> I have answered some questions, but there are small changes and adaptation
>> still required to the ietf draft...
>>
>> tks,
>> Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
>> amsip - http://www.antisip.com
>> osip2 - http://www.osip.org
>> eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speex-dev mailing list
>> Speex-dev at xiph.org
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>>
>>
>