[Speex-dev] RE 2. Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Jean-Marc Valin)

Mon Nov 13 18:41:26 PST 2006

I wish Speex could come with instructions on how to build libspeex_armce.lib.

________________________________

From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org on behalf of speex-dev-request at xiph.org
Sent: Mon 11/13/2006 3:01 PM
To: speex-dev at xiph.org
Subject: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 15

Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to
        speex-dev at xiph.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        speex-dev-request at xiph.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        speex-dev-owner at xiph.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Speex-dev digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Speex AEC AND preprocessor (Aymeric Moizard)
   2. Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Jean-Marc Valin)
   3. RE: Quick survey for Speex 1.2 (Aron Rosenberg)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:33:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Aymeric Moizard <jack at atosc.org>
Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex AEC AND preprocessor
To: speex-dev at xiph.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0611131917550.29158 at sip2>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

I'm working on the echo canceller with the SVN, with Windows Mobile 5
PocketPC.

Obviously, I can't make it run correctly.

My question: If I use the SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_STATE, I have
changes in the sound: noise seems to be removed.

I want to know if I have to use the preprocessor AND that option
to make the echo canceller to work or if it's optionnal?

Is there any other usefull option to the preprocessor that can
be needed or helpfull?

Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:32:28 +1100
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca>
Subject: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2
To: speex-dev <speex-dev at xiph.org>
Message-ID: <45583BAC.7060502 at usherbrooke.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi everyone,

As you may have guess, Speex 1.2 is slowly approaching, though there's
still a lot left to do so I can't say how long it'll take. I thought
this was the right time to ask if there's anything missing or that can
be improved to make 1.2 better. At this point, it can't be anything
major, but there are still some changes that are possible, e.g:

- Improving some component that doesn't behave very well.
- Improving a confusing API.
- Improving robustness of a component to a specific condition
- Adding a minor feature
...

So what's your favourite "I wish Speex could..." or "Speex sucks
because..."? I won't promise I'll take everything into account, but I'll
do my best -- if not for 1.2, then maybe for 1.4. Oh, and no I will not
make Speex compatible with G.729 :-)

        Jean-Marc

P.S. I finally got around to posting my trivial Speex client that shows
how to use Speex with the echo canceller, preprocessor and jitter
buffer. It's in svn at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/speexclient/

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:31:20 -0800
From: "Aron Rosenberg" <arosenberg at sightspeed.com>
Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2
To: <speex-dev at xiph.org>
Message-ID:
        <C214D66711999F4796CA19A15E7323533846E6 at mail.sightspeed.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

It would be nice to merge the Run-Time SSE/Altivec patch that we have
been maintaining.

Aron Rosenberg
SightSpeed Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On
Behalf Of Jean-Marc Valin
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:32 AM
To: speex-dev
Subject: [Speex-dev] Quick survey for Speex 1.2

Hi everyone,

As you may have guess, Speex 1.2 is slowly approaching, though there's
still a lot left to do so I can't say how long it'll take. I thought
this was the right time to ask if there's anything missing or that can
be improved to make 1.2 better. At this point, it can't be anything
major, but there are still some changes that are possible, e.g:

- Improving some component that doesn't behave very well.
- Improving a confusing API.
- Improving robustness of a component to a specific condition
- Adding a minor feature
...

So what's your favourite "I wish Speex could..." or "Speex sucks
because..."? I won't promise I'll take everything into account, but I'll
do my best -- if not for 1.2, then maybe for 1.4. Oh, and no I will not
make Speex compatible with G.729 :-)

        Jean-Marc

P.S. I finally got around to posting my trivial Speex client that shows
how to use Speex with the echo canceller, preprocessor and jitter
buffer. It's in svn at http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/speex/speexclient/
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev at xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev at xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev

End of Speex-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 15
*****************************************

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8565 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20061113/ecfbd439/attachment-0001.bin