[Speex-dev] ILBC performance VS Speex?

Mike Taht mike.taht at gmail.com
Mon May 8 09:10:35 PDT 2006

In the current asterisk code, with the current (1.1.12) speex code, compiled
for sse on x86_64, at a 2 quality setting, speex is now slightly faster than

that said, it's generally slower on most embedded arches

On 5/8/06, he zhu <zhumrkk at gmail.com> wrote:
> I want to choose one codec between iLBC and Speex,because the codec is run
> on the embedded system,so the performance is the key factor to be encode and
> decode to be a real system.
> so ,i like to ask which codec is better in perfomance on the same hardware
> system?
> thank you
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev

Mike Taht
PostCards From the Bleeding Edge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20060508/864607d6/attachment.html

More information about the Speex-dev mailing list