In the current asterisk code, with the current (1.1.12) speex code,
compiled for sse on x86_64, at a 2 quality setting, speex is now
slightly faster than ilbc.<br>
<br>
that said, it's generally slower on most embedded arches<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/8/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">he zhu</b> <<a href="mailto:zhumrkk@gmail.com">zhumrkk@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="direction: ltr;"><div>I want to choose one codec between
iLBC and Speex,because the codec is run on the embedded system,so the
performance is the key factor to be encode and decode to be a real
system. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>so ,i like to ask which codec is better in perfomance on the same hardware system?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>thank you </div>
</div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Speex-dev mailing list<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:Speex-dev@xiph.org">Speex-dev@xiph.org</a><br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev" target="_blank">
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mike Taht<br>PostCards From the Bleeding Edge<br><a href="http://the-edge.blogspot.com">http://the-edge.blogspot.com
</a>