Fw: [Speex-dev] Results of Automated Batch Tests
Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca
Thu Sep 22 05:12:29 PDT 2005
While your tool may be useful to detect regressions (I'd include
fixed-point tests too while you're at it), it cannot be used to really
estimate quality. You could obtain a much better SNR from Speex, but the
sound quality would be much poorer. As for narrowband, it's designed for
8 kHz, so if you send it 16 kHz audio, it'll still think it's 8 kHz and
put twice the nominal bit-rate in it.
Le jeudi 22 septembre 2005 à 10:41 +0200, Nic Roets a écrit :
> The results are at www.rational.co.za/speex.csv
> Each of the 11 quality settings is tested 3 times (narrow, wide and ultra
> wide band). Strangely narrow band quality 11 outperforms all wide band
> tests, but it can be due to my subsampling or some other inaudible effect
> like delaying.
> You can import it into Excel and sort it by SNR or other value. Divide the
> bits by 24 to get the bps.
> The patch is at www.rational.co.za/speexBatchTest.patch
> The complete source is at www.rational.co.za/speex-1.1.10a.tar.gz on a slow
> ----- Original Message ----- Tom Grandgent
> > Hmm, why not just make the URL of the reference sample available in the
> OK. If you run the program and the file was not downloaded, it tells you
> where to get it.
> > Ah, so you need a high resolution timer. IMO, it's better to use
> > timeGetTime() on Windows, which is very simple to use and offers reliable
> I've added #ifdefs that you can fill in.
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca>
Université de Sherbrooke
More information about the Speex-dev