[Speex-dev] Is it a bug?
Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca
Thu Dec 22 04:02:11 PST 2005
> Why is frame_time is equal to frame_size. As we know,if we use 8k
> sampling, the frame_size is 160,
> (frame_size = 320 ,sampling = 16k ..),but the frame_time is const, it
I changed the meaning of frame_time to mean the same as in the RTP RFC,
which means that the units of frame_time are samples... which means it's
the same as frame_size now.
> I think , for (i=MAX_MARGIN-2;i>=0;i--) should be replaced by for
> (i=MAX_MARGIN-3;i>=0;i--) .
yes, probably (have to look at it more carefully).
More information about the Speex-dev