[speex-dev] patch for libspeex
b-speex at blackham.com.au
Fri Dec 13 23:08:53 PST 2002
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 01:46:19AM -0500, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I applied it and it give me up to 15% in speed.
> Doesn't seem to change the results, which is a good thing (though you
> originally forgot a "used=0" in vq_nbest_sign). I'll check a thing or
> two and I'll apply to CVS.
D'oh. My carelessness, sorry! :)
> Strange... on my PIII, encoding a 10 sec file with --comp 3 --quality 3
> takes less than a second (your patch is still a bit faster). How did you
> get these timings?
Using zsh's time function (gives real and user time - which are
pretty similar on this unloaded machine). I've put my sample wave
file at http://dagobah.ucc.asn.au/speextest/sample.wav if anybody
wants to compare times.
I'm curious now why my machine is slower - perhaps it's something
about the way I've compiled it. (Compiles by default with -O2, and I
can slice another .07 seconds off by compiling with -O999 :)
> Sending it to the list is a good idea I think. If you want to know what
> the code does... it's simply calculating the distance between an input
> vector and a list of vectors (codebook) and it returns the id's of the N
> closest (n-best) codebook vectors.
Thanks. I'm beginning to grasp it piece by piece. Currently looking
at the codebook search - next culprit on the list as given by gprof
(and OPTIMIZE :)
bernard at blackham dot com dot au
Australian Linux Technical Conference 2003: http://www.linux.conf.au/
^----- presentations will be recorded with speex :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20021214/682dae7f/part.pgp
More information about the Speex-dev