[opus] opus vs vorbis

[Lucas Clemente Vella]

2017-11-07 11:10 GMT-02:00 encrupted anonymous <sergeinakamoto at gmail.com>:

> did another test of many.
>
> NeroAAC q=1 @400kbps and
> Vorbis q=10 @412kbps shared 2nd place.
> OPUS @330 kbps - 3rd place.
> LAME MP3 q=0 @320 kbps - 1st place.
> ---JPEG file attached---
>
> Please disable speech synthezation
> in OPUS for 96 kbps and up.
> I don't want my music sound like
> from a phone speaker!
>

What are you talking about? I couldn't find any reference to Opus having
any kind of speech synthesization. Can you actually tell Opus apart from
the original in a ABX test?


> Or what is the problem? Modern
> codec at high bitrates should
> produce nearly bit-exact sound,
> not some "optimized for human
> ear" mumbo-jumbo!
>

Well, I actually prefer modern lossy codecs at high bitrates to make the
sound closer to the original, even if at expense of delta wavs.


-- 
Lucas Clemente Vella
lvella at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20171107/a0fd29cd/attachment.html>