[CELT-dev] Modifications of kiss_fft/compatibility with original kiss_fft code?

[Frank Storm]

Ok, many thanks for the info!

Best regards,
Frank

Am 21.02.2011 01:14, schrieb Jean-Marc Valin:
> It's more than just a reorganization of the code/data. The original 
> fixed-point kiss-fft supported either 16-bit precision or 32-bit 
> precision. Instead, the modified version we use in CELT uses 32-bit data 
> with 16-bit twiddles.
>
> 	Jean-Marc
>
>
> On 11-02-20 06:30 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
>>> code, I would like to check whether the changes, that were made to the
>>> original kiss_fft code, change the actual behaviour of the kiss_fft
>>> function or whether they were only made for speed improvement or
>>> cosmetic reasons. In other words, could I still replace the functions
>>> "kiss_fft_alloc" and "kiss_fft" with the original code (apart from the
>>> fact that there are now functions for the inverse transformation in celt)?
>> They were made mostly for data organization reasons (i.e., to allow
>> static data and sharing of twiddles between FFTs of different sizes).
>> The actual transforms should be the same. I'd need to double-check for
>> fixed-point, but in my decoder re-implementation, I was able to start
>> from the current kisfft release and achieve compatibility with the float
>> code without changing the actual calculations involved.
>> _______________________________________________
>> celt-dev mailing list
>> celt-dev at xiph.org
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>