[icecast-dev] proposal: new library, libicecommon
oddsock at oddsock.org
Sat Apr 3 06:07:35 PST 2004
At 12:42 AM 4/3/2004, you wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:19:43PM -0600, oddsock wrote:
>I agree combining the helper modules makes sense. However, I'd suggest
>supporting a static link to
>a local build within the ice* source trees, so you can still do a separate
>checkout and have
>things 'just work'.
what exactly are you referring to with a "static link" ?
>What about the components that are shared between libshout and ice*? Would
>we just be making those
>interfaces public so they could be explicitly shared through libicecommon?
not sure which components you are referring to.. icecast doesn't need
libshout, ices does need libshout. Both ices and icecast need the modules
I'm proposing combining into icecommon, but libshout does not. I guess
probably what you are referring to is the dependency on libshout and what
would become libicecommon.
although there is no dependency between icecast and libshout, I wouldn't be
adverse to encorporating libshout into icecommon, or we could encorporate
all of icecommon into libshout. Looks like the only module that is
currently NOT part of libshout is LOG. So it could be that we can solve
this problem by simply :
1. Adding LOG to libshout
2. Adding libshout as a dependency for icecast.
>This also doesn't help with the 'm4' module.
yes, I agree, any ideas on that ?
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast-dev