[flac-dev] Regain play analysis patches

[Olav Sunde]

At 10:30 10.02.2012, you wrote:

I'd go for Earl Chew's solution as this corrects a possible calculation error, plus it will also handle 192 kHz. Ideally replay gain sample rate analysis should follow sample rate capability of flac itself.

Olav Sunde


>Hi all,
>
>In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches for
>the regain play analysis code.
>
>The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock:
>
>    http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html
>
>simply adds some more higher sample rates.
>
>The second by Earl Chew:
>
>   http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html
>
>is more comprehensive. Neither of the patches currently apply to 
>the code that is currently in git [0], so now is probably a good time
>to discuss these patches and come up with the best approach. Currently
>I lean slightly toward Earl Chew's patch because it seems a little more
>thought out.
>
>Once we have decided on the best solution, I would appreciate it if
>either Earl or Nathan could prepare a new patch.
>
>Cheers,
>Erik
>-- 
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Erik de Castro Lopo
>http://www.mega-nerd.com/
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>flac-dev mailing list
>flac-dev at xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20120210/a0e36261/attachment-0001.htm