<html>
<body>
<font size=3>At 10:30 10.02.2012, you wrote:<br><br>
I'd go for Earl Chew's solution as this corrects a possible calculation
error, plus it will also handle 192 kHz. Ideally replay gain sample rate
analysis should follow sample rate capability of flac itself.<br><br>
Olav Sunde<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi all,<br><br>
In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches
for<br>
the regain play analysis code.<br><br>
The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock:<br><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html</a><br>
<br>
simply adds some more higher sample rates.<br><br>
The second by Earl Chew:<br><br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html</a><br>
<br>
is more comprehensive. Neither of the patches currently apply to <br>
the code that is currently in git [0], so now is probably a good
time<br>
to discuss these patches and come up with the best approach.
Currently<br>
I lean slightly toward Earl Chew's patch because it seems a little
more<br>
thought out.<br><br>
Once we have decided on the best solution, I would appreciate it if<br>
either Earl or Nathan could prepare a new patch.<br><br>
Cheers,<br>
Erik<br>
-- <br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Erik de Castro Lopo<br>
<a href="http://www.mega-nerd.com/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.mega-nerd.com/</a><br><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
flac-dev mailing list<br>
flac-dev@xiph.org<br>
<a href="http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev" eudora="autourl">
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev</a></font></blockquote>
</body>
</html>