[Flac-dev] Re: beta 10 candidate checked in

[Christian Weisgerber]

Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com> wrote:

> .s.lo:
>     $(LIBTOOL) --mode=compile $(COMPILE) -c $<
> 
> it doesn't look like there's a provision for compiling .s files
> with a different program than .c files, or even different flags.

Explicit rules override suffix rules.  It's not elegant, but we
could just write down the individual rules:

--- src/libFLAC/i386/Makefile.am.orig	Thu Jun  7 20:39:34 2001
+++ src/libFLAC/i386/Makefile.am	Thu Jun  7 20:40:18 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
 # nasm build rule:
-%.lo: %.s
-	$(NASM) -f elf -d ELF $< -o $@
+cpu_asm.lo: cpu_asm.s
+	$(NASM) -f elf -d ELF $? -o $@
 
+fixed_asm.lo: fixed_asm.s
+	$(NASM) -f elf -d ELF $? -o $@
+
+lpc_asm.lo: lpc_asm.s
+	$(NASM) -f elf -d ELF $? -o $@
+ 
 noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libFLAC-asm.la
 libFLAC_asm_la_SOURCES = \
 	cpu_asm.s \
-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy at mips.inka.de