[Flac-dev] Re: beta 10 candidate checked in

Matt Zimmerman mdz at debian.org
Sat Jun 9 09:11:29 PDT 2001

On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:20:06PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:

> Josh Coalson <xflac at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > it doesn't look like there's a provision for compiling .s files
> > with a different program than .c files, or even different flags.
> > so now I have no idea how to make this work as we would like.
> What again was our rationale for switching from .nasm to .s?
> <checks archive>
> Oh, I see, the automake/libtool magic for creating a library doesn't
> work otherwise.  Maybe that wasn't the right path.

Yes, I think perhaps the right thing to do would be to add .nasm to SUFFIXES,
and create the proper rules for building .lo from .nasm.  I didn't know about
SUFFIXES at the time, and renaming to .s got it to "work for me".

 - mdz

More information about the Flac-dev mailing list