[Flac-dev] Re: beta 10 candidate checked in
mdz at debian.org
Sat Jun 9 09:09:26 PDT 2001
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:17:48AM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber <naddy at mips.inka.de> wrote:
> > | # nasm build rule:
> > | %.lo: %.s
> Even with gmake, this really works only by accident. Automake
> generates a competing suffix rule, and gmake apparently gives the
> rule above a higher priority than the suffix rule (or that just
> happens to be the evaluation order).
As far as I know, this is the correct way to override a default pattern/suffix
rule. The one specified explicitly should override the default.
> Matt, since you seem to understand automake, can you come up with
> something to properly integrate this with automake's logic?
I believe this can be fixed by adding .s to automake's SUFFIXES variable (not
to be confused with .SUFFIXES). I need to look into it a bit more.
> > .SUFFIXES: .lo .s
> > .s.lo:
> (This of course doesn't work with automake.)
It doesn't? Anything in a Makefile.am that doesn't appear to be special
automake magic is passed through to the Makefile (via Makefile.in). How is
More information about the Flac-dev