[Flac-dev] flac worse than shorten ON SOME FILES
xflac at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 8 12:27:04 PST 2001
had to fix the subject... was getting under my skin!
yeah, could you put up the FLAC version of the
worst track that is less than 20 megs compressed?
(I'll have to grab it with a 56k modem). by worst
I mean the one where shorten beats flac by the most.
1. what version of shorten are you using?
2. what command-line options for flac and shorten
did you use on this track?
--- Mark Powell <M.S.Powell at salford.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Mark Powell wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't :( I've split into individual files
> and found that shorten
> > compresses some files better and flac others.
> However, in total shorten
> > does better. I was just a little surprised,
> because I thought flac would
> > always out perform shorten?
> If you'd like one of the files that shorten does
> better on, I can put it
> up for ftp. I'll shorten it first of course :) The
> smallest is:
> shn 9,898,601
> flac 10,157,063
> Or I can put the whole album up if you have a fast
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
More information about the Flac-dev