[Flac-dev] flac worse than shorten

Mark Powell M.S.Powell at salford.ac.uk
Thu Feb 8 07:30:20 PST 2001


On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Mark Powell wrote:

> Sorry, I don't :( I've split into individual files and found that shorten
> compresses some files better and flac others. However, in total shorten
> does better. I was just a little surprised, because I thought flac would
> always out perform shorten?

If you'd like one of the files that shorten does better on, I can put it
up for ftp. I'll shorten it first of course :) The smallest is:

shn	 9,898,601
flac	10,157,063

Or I can put the whole album up if you have a fast link?
  Cheers.

Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building,
Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.
Tel: +44 161 295 5936  Fax: +44 161 295 5888  www.pgp.com for PGP key





More information about the Flac-dev mailing list