No, I don't think so. Was: [vorbis] Vorbis 1.0 binary - Beta4 still the best?

[Zvezdan Dimitrijevic]

>> Using a graph to illustrate that rc3/1.0 discards phase
>> information is not conclusive proof.

Of course you are right. But, that graphs inspired me to modify some
numbers in RC3 source code. I changed cutoff frequency for phase
information from 6 (q2 & q3) to 16 kHz, and after compiling I got the
RC3 version with I cannot detect a mentioned problem.

Total length of my samples after -q3 compression is about 20% bigger
then length of files generated by v1.0 with -q3. It is same as length of
1.0 files with -q4,999, but on that quality with that version I can hear
mentioned phase distortion.

Zvezdan

<p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.