[xiph-rtp] Alternate Implementations

[Phil Kerr]

Hi Michael,

Many thanks for this offer.

It will certainly help with the IETF process to have multiple 
implementations, especially from the BBC.

Best regards

Phil


Michael Sparks wrote:

>Hi,
>
>
>I'm in the process of reading through the list archives, so I won't say
>much at present (since I'll probably repeat things already said).
>
>However, I just thought I'd say that we're very interested in helping
>this move forward* and should be able to provide another, alternate
>implementation - in the hopes of helping standardisation efforts.
>(Multiple implementations being a normal IETF requirement for
>standardisation)
>   * The BBC's preference for open protocols and standards is hopefully
>     well known!
>
>We'd obviously view it as a secondary, alternate implementation to any
>reference implementation already being written/under way, but hopefully
>useful :)
>
>Best Regards,
>
>
>Michael.
>--
>Michael Sparks, Senior R&D Engineer, Digital Media Group
>Michael.Sparks at rd.bbc.co.uk,
>British Broadcasting Corporation, Research and Development
>Kingswood Warren, Surrey KT20 6NP
>
>This e-mail may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC.
>_______________________________________________
>xiph-rtp mailing list
>xiph-rtp at xiph.org
>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/xiph-rtp
>
>  
>