[vorbis] Vorbis Comment question

[David K. Gasaway]

gtgbr at gmx.net wrote:

 > The ideal concensus is Xiph's current
> standard. It's bigger than before - it really covers everything that
> Vorbis tags were designed for (satisfying a vast majority of possible
> uses), and it's slim enough for most people to actually remember what it
> contains. 

IMO, there is still one serious deficiency with the current Xiph 
standard, especially w.r.t. classical music.  In my tagging efforts, a 
PART tag is almost necessary.

Note: I dislike the parsability requirements for the PART tag spelled 
out at reactor-core.

<p>
-- 
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- XNS  : =David K Gasaway
-:-:- Email: dave at gasaway.org
-:-:- Web  : dave.gasaway.org

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.