[vorbis] Bit Rate Peeling Quality

Greg Wooledge greg at wooledge.org
Mon Jun 23 08:10:30 PDT 2003


J C Fitzgerald (v7022 at wave.co.nz) wrote:

> I know, but I haven't been able to glean a good definition of 'codec'
> yet (and my specific request for a definition went unanswered).

"codec" is just "coder/decoder", or in other words, a software
system which can translate input to a new form, and then translate
back.

Vorbis is a lossy codec, which means that the translation cycle
gets you only an approximation of the original input.

> In my case I have two input and two output cases which I'm trying
> to balance.  On the input side I have sources which will always be
> available to me (unless catastrophe strikes), and others which will
> never again be available.

Depends on how much storage space you are willing to use.  You could
make lossless copies of the original sources which would move them
from the "never again" category to the "always available" category.

> So it seems to me that my best path is to encode now at q6, then in
> the future reencode available sources at q2 while peeling my q6s from
> no longer available sources at q2 (or maybe q3 if this would compare
> better with native q2 encoding).

If you can't afford a spool of blank CD-R's, then yeah, I suppose
this would work too. :)


-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg at wooledge.org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20030623/3ab95b51/part-0001.pgp


More information about the Vorbis mailing list