[vorbis] Re: Please confirm your message
Glendon Gross
gross at netbsd.xinetd.com
Mon Jun 2 18:29:19 PDT 2003
vorbis at xiph.org wrote:
> Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
> We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
> "Re: [vorbis] Re: Quoting (OT)".
>
> Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your
> mailer's "Reply" feature.
>
> vorbis+confirm+1054602922.26986.932b05 at xiph.org
>
> Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org mailing
> lists, we've set up a whitelist system by which anyone can post, but
> the first message from an unknown email address must be confirmed to
> verify that's it's not email from a spam robot. Your confirmation
> reply will add this email address to our whitelist, and allow you to
> post freely to Xiph.Org mailing lists from the confirmed address.
>
> [ This notice was generated by TMDA/0.68 (http://tmda.net/),
> an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
>
> --- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
>
> Return-Path: <gross at netbsd.xinetd.com>
> X-Original-To: vorbis at xiph.org
> Delivered-To: vorbis at xiph.org
> Received: from netbsd.xinetd.com (cpe-24-24-200-23.socal.rr.com
> [24.24.200.23])
> by motherfish-II.xiph.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470AE5329B0
> for <vorbis at xiph.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 21:15:21 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from netbsd.xinetd.com (gospel.xinetd.com [192.168.2.177])
> by netbsd.xinetd.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA02423
> for <vorbis at xiph.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
> Sender: gross at netbsd.xinetd.com
> Message-ID: <3EDBF650.732E6502 at netbsd.xinetd.com>
> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:13:52 -0700
> From: Glendon Gross <gross at netbsd.xinetd.com>
> Organization: Xinetd Communications
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i386)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: vorbis at xiph.org
> Subject: Re: [vorbis] Re: Quoting (OT)
> References: <3ED9F648.2080203 at lala.ath.cx>
> <000a01c32840$703cda00$65c15dd5 at HWim> <3EDA4188.5050204 at lala.ath.cx>
> <3EDA83F1.5070309 at greens.org> <000801c32895$02a34b00$28c0c0c0 at Home>
> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306021912200.498 at princenet.sytes.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> I have a question for you. If I want to write a vorbis client from scratch,
> should it attempt to read the input file from start to finish, or should it
> attempt to start at the end first
> in order to use statistical analysis to optimize the conversion process? I have
> been playing
> around with oggenc and ogg123 and enjoying the way my music sounds, but I can't
> help thinking about how nice it would be to have a portable device that plays my
> ogg vorbis files. :)
>
> In other words, should I "top-post" my input file to the algorithm, or should the
> algorithm
> "bottom-post" it in order to optimize the decompression algorithm?
>
> Also, does anyone have a recommendation for an existing *nix client for
> "streaming ogg-vorbis" files other than
> xmms, which I like? I just used oggasm to convert my entire .MP3 collection to
> ogg-vorbis.
>
> :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Glendon Gross
> thrilled ogg-vorbis advocate
>
> Lorenzo Prince wrote:
>
> > > With properly quoted messages (*not* bottom- or top- posted, but inline
> > > posted), this makes it really easy to read and follow conversation.
> > I agree. Inline quoting is the best way to go. You tackle one topic of
> > the discussion at a time, quoting each part of the message and responding
> > to it individually. This makes it easier all around.
> > > Top-posted (and on a bit smaller scale, bottom-posted) messages cripple
> > > this, since you have to jump up and down to see what the poster is
> > > referring to.
> > I don't, however, see how bottom-posted messages are less crippling to the
> > ability to follow a conversation. Personally, I think it is just redicus
> > to have to scroll past a whole screen of a message I just read, most
> > likely not even 2 minutes ago. I would rather see a top-posted message,
> > because I don't have to read the same message 3 or more times just to try
> > to find the answer I was looking for under all that. If you don't want to
> > inline quote, it is better to top-post. It is easier on both the sender
> > and the reader. I will stress, however, that inline quoting is by far the
> > better choice.
> >
> > Lorenzo
> > -----
> > Personally, I think my choice in the mostest-superlative-computer wars has to
> > be the HP-48 series of calculators. They'll run almost anything. And if they
> > can't, while I'll just plug a Linux box into the serial port and load up the
> > HP-48 VT-100 emulator.
> > -- Jeff Dege, jdege at winternet.com
> >
> > --- >8 ----
> > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
> > Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
> > containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
> > Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Re: [vorbis] Re: Quoting (OT)
> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 18:13:52 -0700
> From: Glendon Gross <gross at netbsd.xinetd.com>
> Organization: Xinetd Communications
> To: vorbis at xiph.org
> References: <3ED9F648.2080203 at lala.ath.cx>
> <000a01c32840$703cda00$65c15dd5 at HWim> <3EDA4188.5050204 at lala.ath.cx>
> <3EDA83F1.5070309 at greens.org> <000801c32895$02a34b00$28c0c0c0 at Home>
> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0306021912200.498 at princenet.sytes.net>
>
> I have a question for you. If I want to write a vorbis client from scratch,
> should it attempt to read the input file from start to finish, or should it
> attempt to start at the end first
> in order to use statistical analysis to optimize the conversion process? I have
> been playing
> around with oggenc and ogg123 and enjoying the way my music sounds, but I can't
> help thinking about how nice it would be to have a portable device that plays my
> ogg vorbis files. :)
>
> In other words, should I "top-post" my input file to the algorithm, or should the
> algorithm
> "bottom-post" it in order to optimize the decompression algorithm?
>
> Also, does anyone have a recommendation for an existing *nix client for
> "streaming ogg-vorbis" files other than
> xmms, which I like? I just used oggasm to convert my entire .MP3 collection to
> ogg-vorbis.
>
> :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Glendon Gross
> thrilled ogg-vorbis advocate
>
> Lorenzo Prince wrote:
>
> > > With properly quoted messages (*not* bottom- or top- posted, but inline
> > > posted), this makes it really easy to read and follow conversation.
> > I agree. Inline quoting is the best way to go. You tackle one topic of
> > the discussion at a time, quoting each part of the message and responding
> > to it individually. This makes it easier all around.
> > > Top-posted (and on a bit smaller scale, bottom-posted) messages cripple
> > > this, since you have to jump up and down to see what the poster is
> > > referring to.
> > I don't, however, see how bottom-posted messages are less crippling to the
> > ability to follow a conversation. Personally, I think it is just redicus
> > to have to scroll past a whole screen of a message I just read, most
> > likely not even 2 minutes ago. I would rather see a top-posted message,
> > because I don't have to read the same message 3 or more times just to try
> > to find the answer I was looking for under all that. If you don't want to
> > inline quote, it is better to top-post. It is easier on both the sender
> > and the reader. I will stress, however, that inline quoting is by far the
> > better choice.
> >
> > Lorenzo
> > -----
> > Personally, I think my choice in the mostest-superlative-computer wars has to
> > be the HP-48 series of calculators. They'll run almost anything. And if they
> > can't, while I'll just plug a Linux box into the serial port and load up the
> > HP-48 VT-100 emulator.
> > -- Jeff Dege, jdege at winternet.com
> >
> > --- >8 ----
> > List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
> > Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
> > To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
> > containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
> > Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis
mailing list