[vorbis] Zinf

[Caleb]

Well Winamp seemes to do what it was supposed to do pretty fine.
Let's just say that Peter did a good job on the input/output plugins :)

Some people consider winamp bloated.. i don't think it is.
And you can't actually see it's bloated from the GUI since it looks the
same :)
All you see is the playlist and the player.

Winamp3 had a nice playlist.
Although the WASABI platform indeed needs some more work done and
polishing, Winamp3 did kick the llama's ass :)

<p>As Nathan I. Sharfi said (i didnt quote his email) Foobar definetly has
a very simple GUI.
I noticed that it doesn't take alot of memory but it's much more cpu
intensive than winamp.

It does have some useful options though, which is a good point.

<p><p>--- Kyle Rose <krose at krose.org> wrote:
> You are joking, right?  For the best in eye candy, winamp's your
> thing.  For actual usability and an intuitive interface, I would
> recommend looking elsewhere.
> 
> When did this drive for custom skins replace good UI design?  I'm as
> much a fan of pretty gadgets as the next guy, but not at the
> *expense*
> of utility.
> 
> Cheers,
> Kyle
>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.