[vorbis] Why the commotion about file extensions?

[Tom Felker]

On Monday 14 July 2003 9:41 pm, Sergey Meniailenko wrote:
> Do we have to mention ogg at all? Could we just go with:
>
> .vorbis
> .theora
> .speex

Actually, I kinda like that.  The only problem is what do we call OggFlac?  
I'm not sure if it matters, though.  Is it important to be able to tell what 
kind of flac file it is by it's extension?


-- 
Tom Felker

They made a crude but listenable crystal radio out of a light bulb, a
crayon, a square of toilet paper, and a rock. They say they'll have
Linux running on it by next week.

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.