[vorbis] Why the commotion about file extensions?

[Sergey Meniailenko]

Do we have to mention ogg at all? Could we just go with:

.vorbis
.theora
.speex

<p><p>Sergey

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-vorbis at xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Tom Felker
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 19:23
To: vorbis at xiph.org
Subject: Re: [vorbis] Why the commotion about file extensions?

...

To anyone else reading, what do you prefer?  (using Vorbis as an example)

.vorbis_ogg
.ogg_vorbis
.vorbisogg
.oggvorbis
.v_ogg
.ogg_v
.vogg
.oggv
.v_og
.og_v
.vog
.ogv
.vo1
.ov1
.v1o
A pink fish
<> =~ /OggS.........................vorbis/;
CmdrTaco associates my files
Other: (specify)


-- 
Tom Felker

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.