[vorbis] offtopic mailer discussion

[Charles Philip Chan]

On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 14:24:50 -0500
<noprivacy at earthlink.net> wrote:

> **BUT** some mailer clients ignore the known problem and allow their
> users to create emails which many(most!) people will be unable to
> read.

Unlike some mailers which attaches those pesky tnef attachments aka
winmail.dat. If Microsoft feels that it is really necessary to have them
in emails, they should have submitted a RFC.

The purpose of a MUA is to communicate and in order to do that, they
must talk the same language. This language is defined in the RFCs.

Charles


-- 
"sic transit discus mundi"
(From the System Administrator's Guide, by Lars Wirzenius)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20030805/df5882fc/part-0001.pgp