[vorbis] Which encoder ver to use?

[Petr Tomasek]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:27:59PM -0500, Jonathan wrote:
> The Garf-tuned encoding is expected under almost all circumstances to sound
> better than the plain 1.0 or Post-1.0 CVS encoder versions.  Garf did
> specific tuning on transient detection and coding, as well as better attack
> detection... Also, on this note, Garf is planning to (in the next update, as
> I understand) fix the quality scale to roughly match the Xiph encoder.  And
> about muddying the water, we all hope it's only a matter of time until
> Garf's tunings are merged into the main CVS, because as far as I know there
> have been no samples which sounded worse with Garf's tunings, and it
> improves quality on all samples I've ever tried ABXing. =)

Huh, how can you compare, if the bitrate doesn't scale the same? :-o
(Nothing against Garf, I appreciate his work...)

<p>
--
Petr Tomasek, http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek/

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.