[vorbis] Which encoder ver to use?

[Andrew Snare]

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 05:22:31PM -0700, Adam Scriven wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 12:38:31PM -0500, Jonathan wrote:
> > If you'd rather wait, I'd suggest you wait until 1.0.1 or when Garf's
> > tunings are merged into the main CVS tree.  1.0.1 is supposed to be mostly
> > bugfixes, while 1.1 is supposed to be massive low-bitrate tuning.
> 
> Which version is estimated to contain Garf's tunings, or are his considered
> low-bitrate (I wouldn't have thought so, if they cover q5-10)?
> 
> Thanks, I'm always curious about when to start my massive CD rip for real.

I'm thinking about starting a rip project for my collection as well.
Because of the uncertainty inherent in ripping to a lossy format,
I'm going to rip using FLAC for 'archival' purposes. That way it's
possible to re-encode to whichever lossy codec is best down the
track. If I start to have disk space problems then maybe it'll be
worth tossing some FLAC streams, but I think that's something to
worry about when the time comes.

Something to think about,

 - Andrew
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.