[vorbis] fitting lots of music into 10GB with Vorbis

Paul Martin pm at nowster.zetnet.co.uk
Sat Nov 9 05:19:00 PST 2002



On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:50:59AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Paul Martin wrote:
> > I tried peeling a recently encoded file (using vorbis 1.0 at q6) to
> > 96kbps (15kbps is straining things a bit).
> 
> That's a lot of peeling already.  Anything more than 30% gets very
> noticable very soon.

Right.

> > Lots of tinkling. Also loss
> > of top end when the signal got very complicated. However, this is to be
> > expected of an early attempt.
> 
> No, this is to be expected of the current libvorbis encoding modes.
> There's nothing another peeler can do (more than very little) better
> about the tinkling and lowpass.

So, you're saying that current encoders are producing not-very-peelable
streams.

> Also, which peeler did you try?

aardappelschilmesje


-- 
Paul Martin <pm at zetnet.net> (work)
  <pm at nowster.zetnet.co.uk> (home)
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.




More information about the Vorbis mailing list