OT - RE: [vorbis] When will quality increase be unnoticable?

[Myles Buckley]

In all the abx'ing and ear testing I've done in the past for my classical
and jazz music I have never seen or heard  bladeenc output worse than xing.
(worse than lame, yes)

Now, to sorta keep this ON topic.  I have never heard a an xing, blade OR
lame encoded mp3 sound better than a Garf tuned RC2 encode of my Jazz and
Classical stuff, (not a large sample set).  
Also, I haven't used blade, lame or xing since RC3 was released. *GRIN*

Myles - ogg'ing and flac'ing happily

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Wooledge [mailto:greg at wooledge.org]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 08:50
To: vorbis at xiph.org
Subject: Re: [vorbis] When will quality increase be unnoticable?

<p>Moritz Grimm (gtgbr at gmx.net) wrote:

> Your problem is Xing. It's the worst encoder on earth.

Second worst, after bladeenc. ;-)


-- 
Greg Wooledge                  |   "Truth belongs to everybody."
greg at wooledge.org              |    - The Red Hot Chili Peppers
http://wooledge.org/~greg/     |

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.