No, I don't think so. Was: [vorbis] Vorbis 1.0 binary - Beta4 still the best?

[Roger]

On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 21:10, Alan MacDonald wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-vorbis at xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis at xiph.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > Zvezdan Dimitrijevic
> > Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 8:46 PM
> > I want to show you graphically about I
> > am talking.
> > 
> > http://members.lycos.co.uk/zvezdand/Diagrams.gif
> 
> 
> Well my only thoughts here are if you can hear those differences in
> phase above 8kHz or so you probably shouldn't be using compression
> anyways.  Those graphs show how 1.0 uses the notion that most people
> can't perceive direction very well above 4kHz (I believe), forget up in
> the 10's of kHz.  BTW, what quality rate was used for those graphs?  
> 
> Alan

plus, it's pretty safe to assume that most that listen to music are 1/2
deaf anyways (since they listen to their music at execessive volume
levels).  ;-)


-- 
Roger
-----
Verify my pgp/gnupg signature on my HomePage:
http://www.alltel.net/~rogerx/about/index.html


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 241 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20020713/bbcbc30c/signature-0001.pgp