[vorbis] had a thought on peeling last night

Shawn Riley roleypup at samford.net
Sun Dec 22 10:10:58 PST 2002



Daniel wrote-
>I dont know how efficient it would be to provide even more streams. But basicly
>this should work by taking a q2, peeling it down to a q1, peeling this down to
>a q0 and peeling this down to a q-1. We then have a q-1 and the difference from
>each level to the next. Listening to the q2 would require to use *all 4*
>streams.

But if in one "frame" (& I'm sure I've got the terminology wrong), but the peeler discards the q2 stream, then takes only the low frequency bits from the q1 stream, & takes the complete q0 & q-1 streams, would that give us a q0.5 stream?

Is it possible to convert an existing vorbis stream into a peelable stream just by reorganising the bits?

- Shawn
--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.



More information about the Vorbis mailing list