[vorbis] Tag changes

[David Gasaway]

Jonathan Walther wrote:

> The main problem is that you require that it only be used when there is
> a single PART tag in the Ogg.

I suggested that was the only time it was required.  Have you 
contradictory example?

> When a problem is solved by a simple
> alphabetical sorting rule, why do you want to complexify things with
> a tag that sometimes can be there, and sometimes cannot?  Right now

I don't see the complexity.  To my eyes, the current definition of PART 
*is* complex.

> all tags can be used at all times.  I don't think you've given a
> compelling reason to change that.

Well, I'm getting back to the "jotting a quick note" idea.  Jotting 
quick notes doesn't follow rules.  You don't consult a formatting 
document to write a note.

> I changed my mind.  Obviously Monty isn't opposed to some parsability;
> why should I be?

Yes, Monty caved ;)   That doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to keep 
this to a minimum.

> I recognize it's a slippery slope.  Don't try to push me further down
> it. :-)

Wouldn't dream of it.

<p>
-- 
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- XNS  : =David K Gasaway
-:-:- Email: dave at gasaway.org
-:-:- Web  : dave.gasaway.org

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.