[vorbis] TwinVQ versus The World
tme at 21rst-century.com
Thu Jun 21 13:30:15 PDT 2001
Karol Pietrzak wrote:
> The last few threads have really been interesting. Technologies
> that are currently on the market are MP3, RealAudio, and Windows
> Media (pre-version8). Technologies currently in progress or
> just shipped are Ogg Vorbis and mp3pro. I don't think anyone
> has mentioned TwinVQ on this list. While exploring alternatives
> to MP3 (which is when I also found Vorbis), I noticed TwinVQ. I
> encoded a few tracks with TwinVQ and they sounded like shit, but
> does anyone still consider TwinVQ a serious competitor in the
> compressed audio market? Does it have _any_ advantages over
> anything else? How about AAC?
In my discussions with MPEG 4 developers, it looks like they may go
with MP3 (aka Layer 3) for audio due to its established position.
This would leave AAC basically in the dust.
> Thanks for everyone's reply ahead of time.
> noodlez: Karol Pietrzak
> PGP KeyID: 0x3A1446A0
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail : tme at multicasttech.com
Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
Check the status of multicast in real time :
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis