[vorbis] (Classical) Request for Standardization of expanded TAGS
Wilson
defiler at null.net
Thu Dec 6 14:25:33 PST 2001
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trick" <gerry at c64.org>
To: <vorbis at xiph.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [vorbis] (Classical) Request for Standardization of expanded
TAGS
<p>> On Thursday 6. December 2001 20:49, Jonathan Walther wrote:
> > Hm, might the DISCID tag not be sufficient, inasmuch as it uniquely
> > identifies the disc, even if its within a box set? If not, I'd lean
> > toward a DISCNUMBER tag.
>
> This is becoming a mess. Ogg tagging is supposed to be simple, not an
> over-the-top latin-language forest of tags like this is becoming.
>
> Maybe some sub-tagging system would help ?
>
I agree.
I'm never going to use anything other than Artist, Title, Album, Genre,
Track#, Year, and Comments.
--Wilson.
<p><p><p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis
mailing list