[vorbis] (Classical) Request for Standardization of expanded TAGS

[Jonathan Walther]

Subtagging how?  I've seen no subtagging scheme that wasn't messier and
kludgier than just using the tags the way they were meant.  If you think
things are becoming messy, its because to accurately tag a piece of
music may be intrinsically messy.  Wouldn't you prefer it was a
standardized mess so it can at least be dealt with?

Jonathan

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:38:20PM +0100, Trick wrote:
>On Thursday 6. December 2001 20:49, Jonathan Walther wrote:
>> Hm, might the DISCID tag not be sufficient, inasmuch as it uniquely
>> identifies the disc, even if its within a box set?  If not, I'd lean
>> toward a DISCNUMBER tag.
>
>This is becoming a mess. Ogg tagging is supposed to be simple, not an 
>over-the-top latin-language forest of tags like this is becoming.
>
>Maybe some sub-tagging system would help ?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: part
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 797 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20011206/1b3f7b72/part.pgp