[vorbis-dev] Re: Final Post/Lack of support

[ChristianHJW]

"Dirk Knop" <dknop at gwdg.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3D3A7477.1000406 at gwdg.de...
> I'm really sorry for the faults on my side, but there's nothing that
> indicates that there will ever be acceptance of an userbase, which is
> BAD for a codec.

<p>koepi,

i do have very similar feelings as you have about .ogm not making its way
into the official Ogg specs, maybe because even if we are not its parents,
we both for sure can be looked at like some of its 'mentors', people that
helped it a lot to be accepted and used by the video encoding community, as
a replacement for outdated AVI.

Being a windows user myself ( in my age you dont get easily used to another
OS, and i hate CLI ;-)  ) i fully agree with you it would have been much
easier to allow .ogm as official extension than to create Ogg Prak, which in
one way or another is nothing else but an extended right click with the
mouse and using the Windows function 'Open With...' , and will lead to
confusion and frustration of possible Ogg users. The fact that OggPrak was
coded by a very good personal friend of mine ( BlackSun ) doesnt change my
point of view here about the use of this program.

Emmett's view here, that we can use whatever extension we want, is no
solution either IMHO, not at all. Coders of Player software will browse the
official Ogg specs when deciding about what extension to register to on
Windows, and they will not care about a bunch of 'MPEG pirates' making
extensions of their own on some dubious boards somewhere.

Nevertheless there is a huge number of .ogms being used right now, and i was
informed unofficially that even p2p software coders now consider to add the
.ogm extension to their search routines, means .ogm would be an allowed
extension for video files on at least some of these programs. ( Sidenote :
Dont make fast assumptions here please, sharing video files over internet
does not necessarily mean pirating !! Who wants to forbid me to share my
last self made vacation movie with other people over internet ?? )

In any case we have to accept Xiph's decision on this issue, we should have
asked them before creating the extension, not afterwards !! Tobias Ogg
implementation ( BTW, we never called it OGM, the users did falsly, for us
it was always OGG, but with a different extension ) made it possible to use
Vorbis as audio codec with our movies, which is impossible in AVI because it
cant handle VBR audio correctly. Vorbis is the best audio codec IMHO for
bitrates 64 - 120 kbps, at least since 1.0 , and this is the ideal range for
use in video compression, making Vorbis the preferred audio codec for the
whole video encoding community.

We can not thank Xiph enough for the fact they created Vorbis, being
opensource, free of cost and with excellent quality. Lets accept the status
quo now as it is and lets avoid to upset the guys .... they dont deserve any
critizism or insulting for giving us Vorbis, nor for giving us Ogg !!

<p>About Tobias' code being opened and the validity of the .ogm files as spec
compliant Ogg files :

I was emailing Tobias about the whole issue, i even inlcuded the IRC log
from last sunday morning. He doesnt respond to my last 5 emails it seems,
allthough i know i am using a valid email adress. Maybe my activity with MCF
or the fact i left Doom9 as mod for the new A/V formats section made him
decide to ignore me, or he doesnt have the time to reply.
As both options are possible i suggest you ( or maybe Blacksun ) write to
him directly about whether he has any plans to make his sources public one
day to allow future development. Note that i will keep out of the matter
from now on.

Best regards

Christian

<p><p><p><p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.